Skip to content
GetProfitable
Search

A daily chart review routine

Lesson 29 · about 7 min

Reading charts is a skill, and skills improve with feedback. The session gives you feedback in the form of money, which is noisy and slow. A daily review gives you feedback in the form of "was my read right?", which is faster and far more useful. This lesson lays out a review routine that takes twenty to thirty minutes and turns each day's charts into practice.

The routine, in order

Do this after the session, or at a fixed time each day for continuous markets. The order matters; it goes from the least emotional item to the most.

1. Update the charts (five minutes). For every instrument on the watchlist, add the day's candle to your understanding. Did any level get tested? Did it hold or break? Did a swing point confirm? Did the trend state change? Retire consumed levels, add new ones if a strong rejection created one. This is the same marking as the previous lesson, done at the end instead of the start.

2. Grade the plan, not the outcome (ten minutes). For each if-then plan you wrote before the open, answer three questions:

Question Possible answers
Did the condition occur? Yes / No / Partially (for example, price reached the zone but no clean close)
If it occurred, did you act as written? Yes / No, I hesitated / No, I entered early or late / No, I changed the stop
If you acted, did the chart behave as the setup predicts? Reached target / Stopped out / Stalled

The middle question is the one that matters most. A plan that fired and that you followed exactly is a success, even if it lost. A plan you deviated from is a failure, even if it made money. Grading this way separates the quality of your reading from the noise of any single outcome.

3. Review the charts you did not trade (five minutes). Look at the instruments where you wrote "no setup." Did one of the three setups form during the day that you missed in the morning? If so, what would you have needed to see? This is where most learning happens, because it is not contaminated by having had money on the line.

4. One note (two minutes). Write one sentence about the day. Not a diary; one observation about the charts. "The retest of 50.20 held to the tick on the 15m." "Third day in a row that the range floor produced a failed break." "I marked resistance at 88 but the real reaction was at 87.40; the zone should have been wider." Over a month these sentences become the most useful document you own.

Key idea: Review the plan, not the profit. A followed plan that lost is a good day; a broken plan that won is a bad one. Add the day's candles to your levels, grade each written plan, look at what you did not trade, and write one sentence. Twenty to thirty minutes, every day.

A weekly addition

Once a week, on a day the market is closed, add three things:

Redo the higher timeframes. Weekly and daily charts change slowly, so you do not need to reread them every day. Once a week, rerun the top-down read for each core instrument from the top. Trends end and ranges form gradually, and a weekly check catches the change before your daily plans start fighting it.

Count. How many plans did you write, how many fired, how many did you follow, how many worked. Four numbers. If plans rarely fire, your conditions are too strict or your candidates are poor. If they fire but you rarely follow, the problem is execution, not reading. If you follow and they rarely work, the reading needs work, and the specific setup that is failing tells you where.

Reread the one-sentence notes. Patterns show up. "Zone too narrow" three times in a month is a lesson you did not notice on any single day.

What to leave out

Do not review the profit and loss during this routine. Look at it once a week with the counts, not every day. Daily P&L is dominated by which trades happened to hit and pulls your attention to the wrong things.

Do not review every trade in exhaustive detail. One line per plan is enough. A review that takes two hours will not happen on the days you most need it.

Do not judge a read by what happened after. Price often goes where you expected for reasons that had nothing to do with your reasoning. Judge the read on whether the structure, levels and trigger were correctly identified at the time.

A sample review entry

 Date: (any Tuesday)

 XYZ   plan fired (retest 50.20, 15m close above) | followed: yes | result: +1.6R, stalled at 52.0, took it
 ABC   plan did not fire (never reached 31.50)     | -              | note: gapped over it; skip condition correct
 QRS   no setup written                           | -              | missed: failed break of range floor at 10:40, textbook Setup 3
 DEF   plan fired                                 | followed: NO, entered before the close | result: -1R, would have been -1R anyway

 Note: QRS failed break was on 2x volume and I was not watching it. Add range candidates to the morning plan even when "no setup yet".

Four lines, one note. That is the whole review.

Try it: Do the routine tonight for whatever charts you watched today, even if you did not trade. Time it. If it took more than thirty minutes, cut it down; the version you will actually do every day is the one that works.

Recap

  • Review daily: update charts, grade each written plan on whether it fired and whether you followed it, look at what you did not trade, write one sentence.
  • Judge the plan, not the profit. Following a plan that lost is a success; breaking one that won is a failure.
  • Weekly: rerun the top-down read, count plans written, fired, followed and worked, and reread your notes.
  • Keep P&L out of the daily review; look at it weekly alongside the counts.
  • Keep it under thirty minutes, so it happens every day.

See it drawn

Original diagrams for the ideas on this page. Illustrative, not real market data.

A range beside a trendOne chart swinging between a flat floor and ceiling, another stepping upwards inside a pair of sloping lines.Range-boundresistancesupportprice bounces between two levelsTrendingthe trend channelhigher highs and higher lowsA range has two flat edges; a trend has two sloping ones.
Range versus trend. On the left price keeps bouncing between the same floor and ceiling, which is a range. On the right each high and each low is higher than the last, inside a pair of sloping lines called a channel.
Breakout and retestPrice stalls under one level, pushes above it, comes back to touch it from above, then continues higher.pricetimeold resistancenow support1price keeps stalling2breaks above3pulls back and retests it4and carries on
Breakout and retest. Price stalls under the same level several times, pushes above it, then drops back to touch it from above before carrying on. That touch is the retest, where the old ceiling is tried as a floor. A break that falls straight back under it is a false breakout.