Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity Markets
Read the paperopens doi.org in a new tab
What they found
Stock volatility rises more after price drops than after equal-sized rises. Two explanations compete: the leverage effect (a falling stock price raises the firm's debt-to-equity ratio, making equity riskier) and volatility feedback (if expected volatility rises, required returns rise and prices must fall now). Using Japanese market and portfolio data, the authors found that the leverage effect alone cannot explain the magnitude of the asymmetry and that volatility feedback plays a major role, with the asymmetry being mostly a market-wide rather than firm-level phenomenon.
See it drawn
Original diagrams for the ideas on this page. Illustrative, not real market data.
What you can use
- Volatility spikes on the way down and fades on the way up; risk models and position sizes should treat declines as more dangerous than rallies of equal size.
- The asymmetry is largely market-wide, which is why index option skew is steeper than single-stock skew.
- Rising expected volatility itself pushes prices down, so a volatility spike is not just a symptom of a sell-off but part of its cause.
Caveats
Japanese data from 1985 to 1994; technical econometric modeling. Both explanations have empirical support and the debate continues.
Tags: volatility, leverage-effect, asymmetry, volatility-feedback
Summaries are our own reading of the paper, not the authors' words. Educational only, not advice. Discuss it in Book Club.