Skip to content
GetProfitable
Search
Dictionary

Bridge hack risk

The concentrated risk that a cross-chain bridge holding pooled assets is exploited, leaving wrapped claims unbacked.

Bridges are among the most attacked components in crypto, because a single contract or multisig secures a very large pot. Attacks have exploited forged deposit proofs, compromised validator keys, and upgrade functions.

The failure is visible immediately in price. When backing disappears, the wrapped-token on the destination chain depegs toward zero while the native asset is unaffected, so holders of the wrapped version take the whole loss.

Example: a bridge holding $300m is drained by forging a deposit message. Wrapped units on the destination chain, which traded at parity, collapse to a recovery estimate of perhaps 10-30 cents. Anyone using those wrapped units as liquidity-pool collateral is liquidated as well.

Related: bridge, wrapped-token

See it drawn

Original diagrams for the ideas on this page. Illustrative, not real market data.

How a position size is worked outAccount size, risk per trade and stop distance feed into one box giving the number of shares.ACCOUNT SIZE$25,000your capitalRISK PER TRADE1%of the accountSTOP DISTANCE$0.50entry to stopPOSITION SIZE500 sharesrisk budget: $25,000 × 1% = $250position size: $250 ÷ $0.50 = 500 shares
Working out a position size. Three numbers decide how big a trade is: the account, the share of it put at risk, and the distance from entry to stop. One percent of $25,000 is a $250 budget, and a $0.50 stop divides into that 500 times.

Educational only, not advice. Spotted an error? Post in Site Feedback.