Under compounding a percentage loss needs a larger percentage gain to recover: down 20% needs +25%, down 50% needs +100%, down 80% needs +400%. This asymmetry is the mathematical case for hard drawdown limits.
It also changes how position sizing should work. Fixed-fractional sizing, risking a constant percentage of current equity, compounds naturally and cannot mathematically reach zero from losses alone; fixed-dollar sizing does not adapt and can.
Worked example: 2% growth per month compounds to 26.8% a year, not 24%. Over ten years that difference is the gap between 8.9x and 6.8x on the original stake.
Related: arithmetic-vs-geometric-return, equity-curve, position-sizing, drawdown