Skip to content
GetProfitable
Search
Dictionary

Sunk cost fallacy

Continuing to hold a losing position because of what it has already cost, rather than what it is worth now.

The money lost is gone whether you hold or sell. The only question is whether the position is a good use of the capital from here. Sunk-cost thinking turns a 1R loss into a bagholder position.

Averaging down into a loser is often sunk-cost reasoning with extra risk attached.

Example: a trader is down $2,000 on a stock and refuses to sell because that would make the loss real. It falls another $3,000. The first $2,000 was already real.

Related: loss-aversion, disposition-effect, bagholder, stop-loss

Educational only, not advice. Spotted an error? Post in Site Feedback.